Fluoride debate brings mixed response The Environmental Protection Agency will debate a draft rule requiring Americans to use fluoridated drinking water for their drinking water on Tuesday as it makes its first public comments on the issue

Fluoride debate brings mixed response The Environmental Protection Agency will debate a draft rule requiring Americans to use fluoridated drinking water for their drinking water on Tuesday as it makes its first public comments on the issue. coque demon slayer That debate could bring mixed response from Democrats and Republicans. Environmentalists and Democrats want a federal ban on fluoride, with or without other additives, for good reason. Fluoride is an integral component of tap water in fluoridated communities and it can kill children. coque anime Fluoride is an essential ingredient in many drugs and has been known to raise cholesterol. Some scientific studies have indicated fluoride might protect the brain from Alzheimer’s disease. coque stitch But some parents who argue for a federal ban of fluoride say they don’t think it’s necessary. Others question its safety. They also see a conflict between parents’ and children’s health needs. coque dbz “The fluoride we use in our water is not the only type of fluoride out there,” said Brian W. Novell, a dental physician and fluorologist who’s been advocating for a federal ban for 30 years.골목 Dr. Novell wants fluoridation to be required in all of America’s water supply. He argues that if it were done without special regulations — as is recommended by his state — there would still be plenty of fluoride available. “I can’t support a federal ban of fluoride in our water,” he said. He also sees the need for a public awareness campaign to promote the science behind fluoridation. Fluoridation is still the standard, he said. “It’s time to bring this issue to the forefront,” said Novell, w포커 의 신ho has written and spoken on fluoridation issues in two books. “Let’s get this in front of the American people.” Congress is considering requiring the use of fluoride in drinking water, with or without other additives. coque joker The House voted to require it in the most recent version of the Safe Drinking Water Act, which was p전주 출장 안마assed in 1996. coque vegeta The Senate, which also has yet to act, will vote on the bill this week. That’s an effort by the chemical industry, which contends that the chemicals in fluoride, like those found in bottled water, cause serious side effects such as tooth decay. Supporters say fluoride may decrease the risk of dental caries. But opponents argue fluoridation has never proven to have any benefit and doesn’t protect health at all.

SHARE THIS POST

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Myspace
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Stumnleupon
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Technorati

Leave A Response