Coque iphone 8 texte Tech Policy Threat Matrix-coque iphone 5c minion-qptrao

Tech Policy Threat Matrix On the whiteboard that hangs in my coque iphone 8 sexy office, I have a giant matrix of technology policy issues and the various policy “threat vectors” that might end up driving regulation of particular technologies or sectors. Along with my colleagues at the Mercatus Center Technology Policy Program, we constantly revise this list of policy priorities and simultaneously make an (obviously quite subjective) attempt to put some weights on the potential policy severity associated witheach threat of intervention. The matrixlooks like this:[Sorry about the small fonts. You can click on the image to make it easier to see.]safety (health coque iphone 8 texte physical safety or, alternatively, child safety and speech / cultural concerns);I realize that some of these five categories could be sub divided and refined. I also understand that these fivegroupingsmay not encapsulate the full range of potential policy issues out there, but I tried to avoid having too many categories tokeep this as conceptually tidy as is possible. However,I might need to add a separate category for civil rights and disabilities related policy issues eventually. Likewise, considerations might deserve itsown category because they coque samsung s5 mini noire do not necessarily perfectlyfit into either the privacy or safety buckets right now, even though that where I have them currently. For example, some privacy activistscall for regulation of data and large databases based on fears about how all that data coque mickey samsung galaxy s6 collection makes people feel about themselves. I consider that a privacy related concern now, but you could imagine that being coque samsung a10 in a separate category. Meanwhile, there long been calls to regulate various types of media content (music, movies, video games, online porn, etc) based on the psychological impact they have on children. Those effects theories have always been considered a child safety issue, which is where I currently have them slotted, but they could probably be its own category that also includedconcerns about distraction and addiction (which could come to haunt VR technologies in the future). Anyway, my colleagues and Iuse this current matrix to help us coque iphone 8 plus mood determine what we should be paying more attention to and what sort of scholarly outputs are needed to address regulatory samsung galaxy note 8 coque transparente threats on each front. Several people who have seen that matrix in my office tell me I should do something more with it, but I’m not really sure what that something would be. In any event,I thought it might make sense to post it here to give othersa feel for the current setof emerging tech policy issues that interest us at Mercatus. I will try to upload new versions of the matrix as that giant whiteboard in my office morphs over time and the list of coque samsung s5 moto technologies and regulatory threats changes or grows. Incidentally, I am often asked to explainthe relative weights I assigned toeach potential regulatorythreat, so I will try to justify some of those rankingshere briefly. (Again, it all quite subjective and I always open to hearing the case for tweakingthe rankings.) Big Data /Online Marketing / theInternet of Things (IoT): Privacy isthe 1 policy threat for these sectors. From a public policy perspective, what unifies these technologies is a growing concern about how expanding private sector data collection efforts could affect our privacy or reputations. aimed at placing restrictions on data collection or use. And it goes without saying that other countries, especially in Europe, already impose a wide variety of controls on data collection in the name of privacy protection. There also exists a variety of closely related security concerns here. But the rise of IoT technologies have introduced safetyconcerns into the coque iphone xs original mix in a major way, too. I think that will continue to be the case for many years to come. Robotics: Safety concerns tend tobe the biggest driver ofcalls for regulation ofrobotic and autonomous technology. For example, new laws and regulations are already being proposed for driverless cars based on fears about the hacking of connected vehicles. And commercial drones attract policy attention based on safety related concerns such as whether a drone could strike an airplane, or even just fall on our heads. Proposals have beenfloated to mandate the equivalent of DRM for drones, which would force drone innovators to embed federally approved technological controls into their systems designating where they are allowed to fly. Even coque cigarette iphone 8 if most of these concerns are overstated or are currently being dealt with, we can expect moresafety relatedpolicy proposals for robotic tech in coming years. Economic concernswould be a close secondheredue to the increasing worry thatrobots will eat all ourjobs. At least so far, however, coque iphone 8 protector that concern has tended to be more of an academic naturerather than a public policy consideration. And it remains unclear what the policy prescription would be in thisregard without becoming a neo Luddite, sort of proposal. That could change in coming years, however. It all depends on the labor market situation over time. Meanwhile, academics are floating the idea of a Federal Robotics Commission to provide greater policy in the form of yet another technocratic Beltway bureaucracy. Additive manufacturing / 3D printing:Safetyis probably the 1 concern here, although depending coque iphone 8 ultra fine et legere on what type of 3D printed object we are talking about, it could be coque samsung j5 the case thatintellectual property concerns will be a bigger driver of calls for coque iphone 8 contour rouge regulatory intervention. bague homme A lot of the policy related concerns around 3D printing today are being driven by worries over things like 3D printed guns. That mostly a safety concern, of course. But it we are talking about the replication of branded commercial objects (3D printed toys or other things, for example), then IP tends to be the bigger concern. The question of product liability also looms large here and it remains unclear how claims might be sorted out when there are fewer large, deep pocketed intermediaries to go after in a world of decentralized production. 230 norm for 3D printing). fundas samsung galaxy s9 plus Medical tech innovation: It goes without saying that traditionalsafety concerns will drive policy for advanced medical technologies, just as they have for earlier drugs, devices, and treatments. As software continues coque iphone 8 lapinette to the world and invade the world of health and medicine, regulators are coque iphone 11 increasingly going to be trying to figure out how to pigeonhole new technologies into old regulatory constructs. That why I have beenwatching coque samsung a8 how the FDA continues to deal with 3D printed prosthetics and mobile medical apps on our smartphones. Eventually, the continuing decentralized democratization of 3D printing (drivenby rapidly falling costs) will collide with old medical device regulatory realities and a century worth of FDA command and control style regulation. fundas samsung galaxy a3 Oh my, what a fight that will be! And then coque samsung galaxie note 3 lite disney chemical printers will become more widespread and thisissuewill geteven more intense. The policy fight here is even more interesting because of all the thorny ethical issues pertaining to the rise of embeddable technology, biohacking, and genome innovation. I have a feeling that my policy portfolio will shift rapidly in this direction in coming years as the modern info tech revolution spreads to the world of medicine and health. fundas samsung galaxy note9 I already have two new papers coming out on these issues in the next few weeks. Sharing economy:Economic disruptionis clearly the big policy issue here. fundas samsung galaxy s10 plus Specifically, many policymakersand incumbent industries aren very happy about new entrants coming into their sectors and offering consumers services without strictly complying with traditional regulations. Butsafety issues often pop up in these debates when regulators or advocates claim we can trust sharing economy operators. What particularly interesting about this space is how these policy battles are playing out at almost every level of government: federal, state, local, and international. At least thus far, sharing economy innovators tend to be winning most of those battles. fundas samsung galaxy a50 But the fight continues. Crypto Bitcoin: I thinksafetywould probably be the biggest issue here, in the sense that policymakers fear a world of unregulated crypto and decentralized blockchain applicationsare a world in which the guys will be able to use those technologies to harm the public in some fashion. We heard this all before, of course, but (going all the way back to the Clipper Chip wars) you can always bank on law enforcement officials coque iphone 8 plus fine resorting to Chicken Little claims about terrorists and child predatorsthriving in a world of unregulated crypto. In many ways, this is the most important of all these policy fights because if the government can regulate crypto and blockchain technologies, it severely undermines the fabric of almost all the other technologies and platforms discussed herein. This is why the current debate over government mandated is so important; it has profound ramifications for every other tech regulation debate that follows. Immersive Tech (VR and augmented reality): This is an amorphous and evolvingarea that I am getting increasingly interested in, but the policy issues here have yet to come into clear focus. However, when Google Glass was launched, there was a brieftechnopanic of sorts over its privacy and security ramifications. Those concerns have subsided a bit as Google Glass has seemingly faded away (probably because of its high price point more than because of its privacy concerns), but I suspect that future iterations of augmented reality technologies will raise similar concerns. That will especially be true as more sophisticated biometric (and facial recognition) capabilities are integrated into them. fundas huawei y6 2019 Academics are already wondering how to enforce and consent privacy norms and rules in a world where everyone is wearing miniature body cams and heads up displays in coque samsung a40 their sunglasses. I not sure it even possible, but that debate will continue and include all sorts of calls for technological controls. OK, that augmented reality, but what about virtual reality technologies I think safety concerns could drive some policy proposals as critics grow concerned about the psychological implications of people (especially kids) spending more and more time in immersive virtual worlds. In that sense, we might see a replay of the earlier debate over violent video games and/or video coque chic iphone 8 game addition. But it remains to be seen. Incidentally, I use this matrix and provide more context to it in my big presentation on”Permissionless Innovation the Clash of Visions over Emerging Technologies. Finally, I discussed many of these policy threats during my recent appearance on the Andreessen Horowitz podcast. Update 10/2/15:For another take on various new technology trends and the potential policy issues they raise, check out this report from the World Economic Forum, Deep Shift: Technology Tipping Points and Societal Impact. The WEF reportidentifies21 technology and then groups them into six “mega trend” categories.

SHARE THIS POST

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Myspace
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Stumnleupon
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Technorati

Leave A Response