Abjorensen is recent history repeating for tony abbott’s electorate

Abjorensen is recent history repeating for tony abbott’s electorate. It may well be that Abbott is not even the latest example of a prime minister w바카라사이트ho lost his way on the question of abortion, or the latest instance of a party leader to be cast as the leader of a pro-choice movement. Rather, Abbot lost his way over the last decade or so in two ways: first as prime minister, then as a m바카라inister. fundas samsung galaxy a5 And when he did finally take up the cause, it was as a former federal solicitor-general, acting as deputy to the justice minister, and later as attorney-general. And when he did do it, Abbott wasn’t afraid to say so in the media. He was confident. He knew his case. And he wasn’t afraid of answering, as he often did on stage on Question Time, in front of a nationally broadcast audience. Abbott’s campaign against abortion was more than a fight over which side he was on. iphone 8 hoesjes It was, rather, about the politics of power at work in Australia. fundas samsung galaxy s20 And, as the late Australian journalist John Hewson once famously put it, it was “the most interesting story of the 20th century”. It’s a story that Abbott has been trying to tell all year long. fundas huawei mate 20 lite In what is a remarkable story, the prime minister has been able to find a willing audience even on the fringes of his own party. And though he is, at times, accused of wanting to cut back on women’s rights, it’s worth asking how he can justify, or even explain, his position on abortion rights if he believes바카라사이트 they are worth fighting for on that issue. Abbott’s recent history and present state of public perception are instructive, as is his explanation of what that politics means. What he says, after all, isn’t always what others feel about it. fundas iphone 7 8 plus But it’s a fascinating account of the politics of power, of power being defined in the world as something very different from what it was in Abbott’s own day, whether we’re talking about the way he was able to change the definition of politics, or the way he was able to claim credit for all of these great changes. It is, for that reason, one of the very few things to which he’s able to claim credit. It’s an account of public perception, of political debate, of politics itself.

SHARE THIS POST

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Myspace
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Stumnleupon
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Technorati

Leave A Response